Categories

  • Commentary consisting of my feelings and thoughts on issues I want to relay to the President.

    2 Topics
    2 Posts
    e henryE
    Dr. Mr. President, I just wanted to let you know that I am very impressed with your ability to stay calm in the face of adversity. You behaved with aplomb and honor when confronted by tyrannical bullies. You are an inspiration to leaders around the world. You inspire and awe many including myself. I am sure the people of your country are proud to call you their President. I only wish other world leaders had the courage and tenacity to fight for their country and convictions the way that you do. Your bravery distinguishes you from your peers. Ukraine is lucky to have you as their leader. Please continue to inspire, A Western Ally
  • Breaking News

    10 Topics
    11 Posts
    e henryE
    The U.S. Department of Treasury just ended a rule that was used to register and document the use of shell companies, sometimes used to cover up money laundering, illegal business practices, hiding assets or income used to influence elections, etc. The rule will only be enforced for foreign business holders. The rule which put in place the Beneficial Ownership Information reporting (BOI) which required all businesses to register their business or businesses on a website with the owners name; date of birth; address; and identification number from a state issued drivers license, ID or a passport. Rolling back regulation and ending enforcement of this rule could lead to an increase in: illegal money flooding into our elections, domestic drug trafficking, or other nefarious business practices, by affording them less red tape and accountability. Another problem, it could embolden U.S. citizens acting on behalf of a foreign person, government, or criminal, to open a shell corporation. (Also, if you were not aware, approximately 80% of Fentanyl that comes over our border was transported by U.S. citizens). The Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessant, put out a statement in regard to the rollback of this rule, “The Treasury Department is announcing today that, with respect to the Corporate Transparency Act, not only will it not enforce any penalties or fines associated with the beneficial ownership information reporting rule under the existing regulatory deadlines, but it will further not enforce any penalties or fines against U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners after the forthcoming rule changes take effect either. The Treasury Department will further be issuing a proposed rulemaking that will narrow the scope of the rule to foreign reporting companies only. Treasury takes this step in the interest of supporting hard-working American taxpayers and small businesses and ensuring that the rule is appropriately tailored to advance the public interest. “This is a victory for common sense,” said U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent. “Today’s action is part of President Trump’s bold agenda to unleash American prosperity by reining in burdensome regulations, in particular for small businesses that are the backbone of the American economy.”” The rules came amidst the 2022 invasion of Ukraine and our ramped up sanctions on Russia, a country known for using shell corporations to hide its assets in Western countries. Shell Corporation’s are legal but they have been used for illegal activities and this rule helped in combating money laundering; which is not just a foreign business problem. When the bill, The Corporate Transparency Act was proposed in 2019 it got bipartisan support and passed in December of 2020. When the BOI rule was introduced, “The Treasury Department said it was moving to create a database that will contain personal information on the owners of at least 32 million U.S. businesses as part of an effort to combat illicit finance. Treasury officials said the new rule represents a sea change in the world of corporate transparency.” According to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) website (who regulates BOI under the Treasury Department), “The mission of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is to safeguard the financial system from illicit activity, counter money laundering and the financing of terrorism, and promote national security through strategic use of financial authorities and the collection, analysis, and dissemination of financial intelligence.” The ending of the enforcement of this rule seems counterintuitive to the fight against crime to ensure America's safety. https://apnews.com/article/treasury-beneficial-ownership-database-finance-bessent-trump-a903100907851cca1930511f96e9686d https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0038 https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-putin-politics-business-bc1631f23fe2f14273dcaed6fbd3883b https://www.fincen.gov/boi https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2015 https://www.uschamber.com/co/start/strategy/small-business-corporate-transparency-act https://www.fincen.gov/about/mission#:~:text=The mission of the Financial,analysis%2C and dissemination of financial https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/us-congress-bans-anonymous-shell-companies-2020-12-11/ https://campaignlegal.org/update/secret-election-spending-proliferates-through-shell-companies https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Fentanyl_FY21.pdf https://www.cato.org/blog/us-citizens-were-80-crossers-fentanyl-ports-entry-2019-2024 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2513
  • A place to talk about whatever you want

    12 Topics
    14 Posts
    RussR
    I finished reading Virginia Roberts Giuffre's book called "NOBODY'S GIRL" yesterday. It was disturbing, but it is a good way to understand what happened. Virginia's own father started sexually abusing her at 7 years old, then he allowed his friend to abuse her. She ran away and was raped while hitch-hiking, then Ron Eppinger (a pimp) found her, raped her, and made her his prostitute, then Eppinger "gave" her to his friend to continued to abuse her until the police busted him and called Virginia's father. When she was 16 and working at Mar a Lago, Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her for Jeff Epstein who had sex with her while she was still 16, then for years she was forced to have sex with him (and sometimes Ghislaine Maxwell). He also lent her to his rich and powerful friends for sex (that he recorded). He threatened her brother if she said anything, and he said he owns the police. She planned her escape by convincing Epstein and Maxwell to allow her to go to Thailand for a massage class as a condition for agreeing to have Epstein's baby (that Maxwell and Epstein would raise). While there, she met and married her Australian husband, then moved to Australia with him. With the help of a photo of herself with Prince Andrew, she was able to finally win against him in court in spite of the emotional toll, financial and physical danger, time, effort, and negative publicity it cost her and her new family to do so. At the end of the book, she asked, "Where are those videotapes the FBI confiscated from Epstein's houses? And why haven't they led to the prosecution of any more abusers?" It's a good question. She wrote that she avoided naming certain powerful people to avoid their wrath. Our federal "Justice" department could use that evidence to hold them accountable, if Donald Trump would allow it. He told Marjorie Taylor Greene "people would get hurt." I say, let them get hurt. Consequences for crimes (rape, sex trafficking, pedophilia, blackmail) are necessary to discourage them, and no one should be above the law.
  • Got a question? Ask away!

    1 Topics
    2 Posts
    e henryE
    @Russ Hopefully this makes a positive difference. Thanks for the link, I'll check it out.
  • Blog posts from my perspective

    13 Topics
    13 Posts
    e henryE
    As a child of the late 60s and early 70s, a teenager of the late 70s and early 80s, and a young adult of the mid 80s, I lived during the time of the Cold War. Back then, we lived under the threat of nuclear attacks on a possible global scale. But, as I look back on 2025, that does not even compare to our challenges today. Back then, we knew the government, our elected/appointed officials, and business leaders had our back and we trusted them to protect us. Today, they have their boot on our neck and we realize they hate us. Back then, the country was led by statesmen and scholars, with a commitment to the Constitution. Today, it is ruled by conmen and extremists, with a disregard for the Constitution and the rule of law. Back then, we believed our leaders would usually do the right thing or reach a broadly beneficial compromise. Today, we are stunned and/or relieved when they do. Back then, the country needed a thriving middle class to prosper and stand strong with like-minded allies as a beacon of freedom. Today, those in power seek to eliminate the middle class and channel prosperity to only a chosen few, while simultaneously alienating our friends and weakening all that existed before. Back then, we resisted our Russian adversary and welcomed the fall of the Soviet Union. Today, we seem to be aiding them in rebuilding their occupation of Europe. Back then, many countries respected or admired us. Today, most mock or pity us. Back then, we were proud of our country and its potential. Today, we mourn in shame at what we have lost or recklessly cast aside. Back then, people could afford to pursue their dreams and enjoy a comfortable life. Today, the basic necessities of food, housing, and healthcare are what people dream to be able to afford. Back then, people would endeavor to become well-educated, pursue truth, and understand history. Today, extremists endeavor to rewrite or obscure all of that. Back then, millionaires and billionaires (there were far fewer than now) used their money and influence to cheat their way out of paying taxes. Today, they still do that, but they now use that money and influence to cheat every citizen out of their right to self-governance. Back then, leaders would occasionally succumb to their worst inclinations and engage in acts of oppression or cruelty. Today, it is their systemic mission. Back then, our elected officials would occasionally lose their way and tread down the path of corruption and crime. Today, many willingly, eagerly, and zealously choose that path openly and attempt to normalize it. Back then, the country wasn't perfect. Today, we struggle, and frequently fail, to avoid further decline. Back then, people protested and made sure their voice was heard, especially at the ballot box. Today, some of that happens, but, for the most part, people just look at their phones. Back then, we had hope that we would continue to try to make life better for everyone. What do we have today?